![]() When I tested 2800 Mhz Ram, performance was lower than 2400 Mhz Ram. Higher ram speed which forces a higher Strap and BLCK is actually slower. It looks to me that HW-E is best with 2666 Ram and 100 Mhz Strap and BCLK. Quite a drop in Cinebench score with 125 Mhz CPU Strap and BCLK. As long as my testing procedure is accurate this proves that HW-E works much better with a 100 Mhz Strap and BCLK. Main and Sub and they were Identical in both tests. By utilising AI overclocking in the ASUS BIOS, Jay achieved 28,750 with Cinebench by simply using XMP memory settings, select AI Optimised overclocking, and added a -70mV offset for Adaptive. I just did some tests with the same Ram speed but different Strap and BCLK. With this Ram 2800 has a lower cinebench score compared to 26 with CPU Render Testing.īack to Cinebench score lowering with 125 Mhz Strap and BCLK. Maybe having the base clock on anything other than 100 causes some other issues with syncing the Ram and Cache together.Īnyone else noticed a similar thing when running 2800 compared to 26 ? My Cinebench score actually went down by 1.1% compared to the 2400 Ram ! It actually increased the CPU from 4.4 Ghz to 4.45 Ghz. R23 is not saving benchmark results properly, if you want to keep your score and have it readable you need to add a line to the. The XMP profile upped the Ram voltage from 1.2v to 1.35v and set the CPU strap and baseclock. Intel Core i9-11900K 8 Core vs Core i9-10900K 10 Core CPU Benchmarks With 5.2 GHz Overclock Coming straight to the performance numbers, both CPUs were tested at an overclock frequency of 5.2 GHz. I then tried the Ram at 2800 using the XMP profile number 2. was getting nice cca 9,6 Points in Cinebench 11.5. I thought I had the fans set at 100 in the BIO. You can see a video of the Cinebench run here: ame /ame The temperatures get high, over 90C sometimes. ![]() 2666 still used as base clock of 100 Mhz. As the title say, i had my 980x overclocked to 3,78 with Turbo, no voltage increase. My current system, an Intel i9-9900KS, overclocked to 5.1 GHz (and sometimes 5.2 GHz) is scoring in the 5200 to 5300 range on Cinebench R20. I started off with 2666 and my cinebench score went up 0.7 % compared to the Gskill 2400. And according to reviews it will run at 3000 by relaxing the timings a bit. This Ram even has an XMP profile for 2800, Even though it's labelled 2666. I went out and bought myself some Corsair Vengeance LPX 2666 so I could play with different speeds for myself and see if the difference is really not worth the extra money as I have read on reviews. Going clockwise, there is the Intel LAN PHY and second LAN controller as well as the Realtek audio codec. load the test scene, a warning will be displayed, and the CPU benchmark will not be executed. What Im most concerned with is the performance after the down clock and trying to re-overclock, cinebench R15 899 today vs 572 yesterday with the same bios, heaven bench lost 86 average frames and almost 2200 points off the score. Bottom Right Corner Bottom Left Corner Moving around the board, we have another Marvel SATA 6Gb/s controller for the eSATA port. Cinebench R23 will not launch on unsupported processors. I'm puzzled.Īm I supposed to follow some rules here? Or does the software pick up information about the Haswell that it misses for my Sandy? I'm puzzled. If you try to overclock something too far, this will tell you quickly where you went wrong. I'm a bit puzzled, because R15 reports my processor only as 3.40 Ghz," but the ranking data shows an i7-4770K Haswell at 4.40 Ghz. I'll be interested to see it among the others. Same processor 4.70 Ghz, GFX and settings, with DDR3-1600 stock & CMD=2 Same processor, GFX and settings, with DDR3-1600 1866 and CMD=2 ago A few AMD and Intel rigs, with AMD and NVidia GPUs. CPU-Z, HW Monitor, etc, all report my current clock frequency. I'd never worked with Cinebench before - I just saw the results of reviews for various hardware.Īnd since I don't want to fiddle with the screen-capture and whatever I need to do so that I can post it, I'll just report: As you can see in the picture it just renders a black screen and gives me an absurdly high score. I have my 4770k that I recently bought OC'd to 4.0 GHz (for now, since I only have the stock heatstink at the moment) 1.2 volts (1.15 passes Prime95 for over an hour with no WHEA Errors but will BSOD on OCCT so I rasied it to 1.2).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |